It’s no secret this has been a frustrating year for Lady Vol fans. It must be even more frustrating for the players and coaches. Preseason expectations were sky high, with a national ranking in the top four. As the uncharacteristic number of losses have mounted, some fans have bailed, while others have called for Holly Warlick’s head. While I haven’t jumped on the Fire Holly bandwagon, I have shared the general negativity and felt the frustration.
Well, I’m here to tell you today, things ain’t that bad.
It’s probable now that the preseason hype was just wrong. The 2015-16 edition of the Lady Vols is not a top 4 team, and probably not a top 10 team. The losses from last year’s squad, Isabelle Harrison, Ariel Massingale, and Cierra Burdick, who were sitting courtside at the South Carolina game Monday night, were too much experience and maturity to lose in a single year. Wit the exception of Geno Auriemma’s squads at Connecticut, and possibly Muffet McGraw’s at Notre Dame, women’s college basketball teams need time to mature and learn how to win at the college level. Let’s give Geno and Muffet their due; they are proven, exceptional coaches, on the level that Pat Summitt was in her glory days, but most coaches and most players don’t have that magic touch, whatever it consists of, which doesn’t mean they aren’t good coaches. It’s just that coaches who can hit the ground running with underclassmen are exceedingly rare. There isn’t one out there waiting to replace Holly, who is as good a coach as we’re likely to find considering neither Auriemma or McGraw are looking for a job.
The South Carolina game was another loss, but Tennessee showed they belonged on the same floor with the number #2 team in the country, and that’s not nothing. They played hard, they played together, and they were competitive, until the fourth quarter when it got away from them, but even then they rallied and at the end were closing the gap. They are perhaps one big player away from winning the game. Or, perhaps, one year of experience away.
Fans who have been around for a few years should remember that Harrison, Burdock, and Massingale were not, as freshmen and sophomores, the players they were as juniors and seniors. They IMPROVED exponentially as they matured.
Now, consider the core of this year’s team.
The only seniors are Bashaara Graves and Nia Moore. Obviously, Bashaara is a very accomplished player who will be missed. Nia is a fan favorite who has provided valuable minutes but has never factored very much in the game to game grind.
This means, EVERYBODY ELSE is coming back next year.
Red shirt players, who have an extra year of eligibility because of injuries or transfers and will benefit from the extra time, are:
Andraya Carter, junior. High energy player, perhaps should be considered a role player rather than a team leader. Seems to have lost a bit of speed and hops, wearing the leg brace.
Diamond DeShields, sophomore. Hugely talented. Some difficulties meshing with the rest of the team, and sometimes prone to forcing plays or pressing, but a nearly unlimited upside.
Mercedes Russell, sophomore. Growing game by game in confidence and leadership. Although some fans consider her play to be beneath the level they expected from the top-ranked recruit in her class, she has the best offensive stats on the team and has been the most consistent player. She’s also holding her own against the taller teams, and I see her improving over the next two years as well.
Jasmine Jones, junior. The x-factor. Concussion issues shortened her season last year, leading to the granting of an extra year of eligibility. Another concussion this year has kept her out of most games again and she has been sorely missed. Was a very productive player, and potentially still a starter as she is extremely athletic, but whether or not she will be again is anybody’s guess, but IF she can go, she will be a major contributor. If not, a major loss.
The rest of the team in order of potential as I see it:
Te’a Cooper, freshman. Already in the starting lineup. Consistency issues, certainly, but physical talent approaching DeShields.
Jaime Nared, sophomore. Versatile, maturing rapidly. Can fulfill many roles well, from taking the lead to supplying support. Good defender, good offensive player. Injured early, she seems to be making up for lost time. This year’s most improved player.
Jordan Reynolds, junior. Not starting recently, but owing more to the emergence of Cooper and Nared than deficiencies in her own game. Tenacious and hard-nosed.
Alexa Middleton, sophomore. I love her game. Like DeShields, a tremendous passer, but also a consistent hard worker on defense (DeShields occasionally gets distracted) with a better than average outside shot. Also like DeShields, her passes too frequently fool the player she is passing to as much as the defense. The cure for that is more playing time.
Kortney Dunbar, sophomore. Deadly outside 3-point shot, still a little slow on defense. Used wisely, which Holly seems to be doing now, she can make a huge difference as a role player, playing catch up or building leads.
Meme Jackson, freshman. Little used, the jury is still out. But I’ve liked what I’ve seen for the most part given her limited playing time.
So, this is my main point: because almost everybody on this team will be back next year, they will almost inevitably be a better than they are now. Seven out of the twelve have at least two more years of eligibility. The future, in other words, is bright.
In hindsight, which is always more reliable than foresight, we (the media, the fans, and the coaching staff) shouldn’t have been quite as high on the squad as we were. A better strategy would have been to discount the high ranking rather than embrace it. Our thinking was, let’s assume the ranking is deserved despite the youth of the team, maybe it will give the young players a confidence to believe they are an elite team, which is what we want to believe as well, and they might actually perform on that level. it might have worked with some very special teams, with great chemistry and those rare players who hit the ground running, but for this team (and most young teams) excessive praise out of proportion to actual accomplishments is more likely to lead to perhaps a bit more complacency and not enough urgency in preparations and end-game play. Perhaps they would have been better served by having their preseason ranking discounted by Holly and the coaching staff; I think that is the strategy Coach Auriemma is more likely to employ most years. The rankings mean nothing; preseason polls are unearned laurels, you have to show you deserve it on the court, and until you win it doesn’t matter what the press says or what the public thinks. You earn your status on the court, not in the newspapers.
A good tournament run this year is still possible for Tennessee, as the South Carolina game showed. But next year, with lessons learned and still being learned, it should be even more likely.