Holly Warlick got the axe this week after a disappointing season in which a couple of mortifying team records were set or tied: lowest win total, longest losing streak, earliest exit from the NCAA tournament. Honestly, to last seven seasons in the shadow of Pat Summitt is an achievement, and overall her win-loss record was as good as most anybody else’s, but the team did not seem to be getting better.
There are some caveats. Number one, this was a young team, that perhaps overachieved so much early in the season, we got to thinking they were better than they actually were. In the past, and also this year, there have been injuries to players that were expected to be contributors. Finally, no one is going to be Pat Summitt ever again. Except maybe Geno Auriemma, and he’s not only not going to come to Tennessee under any circumstances, certainly not for the money Tennessee was paying Warlick. The majority of Tennessee fans wouldn’t want him anyway, given the bad blood between Auriemma and Summitt at the end.
My opinion has always been, if your coach is contending for championships, winning more games than she’s losing, recruiting good players who not only improve their skills under your tutelage but also graduate, and you cheat, have scandals, or bring bad publicity to the school, you should probably keep your job and even be celebrated for how you’re doing it. I still believe this, and I don’t think, if I was in AD Philip Fulmer’s shoes, I would have fired her after this season, but it doesn’t come as any surprise that he did. There has been a lot of pressure to fire Warlick almost from the start, for the crime of not being Pat; however, fans tend to forget that Pat hadn’t been Pat for a while either, thanks, probably to her undiagnosed
Alzheimer’s Disease, but possibly because her methods were not keeping up with the game. Tennessee was successful for years when the talent pool was much thinner, simply by recruiting the best players, and motivating them to play harder than anybody else. That might not be enough anymore. With more talent, there are more good teams, and other factors, such as superior game plans or the ability to shift gears more quickly when things aren’t going as planned, might be taking on more importance when everybody is good, everybody is conditioned, and everybody is motivated. I’m not an insider; I’m not even particularly knowledgable about basketball. But, that’s how I see it. Whether or not this will turn out to be a good move will depend on whether or not Holly’s as-yet unknown replacement can maintain the standards Warlick did maintain, can also win more games. It’s not a given, I can tell you. A lot of highly-regarded coaches have moved up into situations where it looked like they couldn’t fail, and failed.
The Westbrook comments after the first game NCAA exit were not wise; even though she didn’t call explicitly for Holly to be ousted, it’s hard to construe what she did say as supportive. Perhaps that was the nudge Fulmer needed, to have your best player seemingly disgruntled. It won’t make Westbrook’s final two seasons any easier, particularly if the new coach, whoever she is, isn’t immediately successful. Warlick had a lot of detractors, but she also still had a lot of fans. You can expect some of them at least to take it out of Westbrook, if she or the team falters.
Over the past couple of seasons there have been, not exactly scandals, but incidents that could be construed as troubling. In addition to the Westbrook public comments, we’ve seen Diamond DeShields passing up her final year of eligibility, Te’a Cooper transferring to South Carolina after getting suspended because of a fistfight with Jaime Nared, Anastasia Hayes being dismissed from the team for undisclosed team rule violations, subsequently causing her talented younger sisters to withdraw their letters of intent, and veteran guard Alexa Middleton transferring because she was dissatisfied with her role, are all events that would have seemed unthinkable when Pat was in her prime. I don’t say any of these things are Holly’s fault, though it seems likely that some of them might be. If nothing else, she can be faulted for not recruiting young women of better character.
I think her media presence was also not a strength. She was obviously never as comfortable with the press as Pat was, and her answers to questions often seemed less authoritative than they should be, coming from the head coach of one of the most prestigious programs in women’s college basketball. Too often, in post-game interviews, she would sound discouraged while citing the reasons for the loss, or else bewilderment at the team’s lack of effort: we didn’t play hard, we didn’t play defense, we didn’t box out, we shot too many threes, we didn’t stick to the game plan. Well, if any of these things are the case, why were they allowed? Geno has a strict, and, it seems to me, wise system at Connecticut; if you aren’t following the game plan, or the instructions, it doesn’t matter who you are, you’re coming out and you’re going to be sitting for awhile. Mind you, Geno makes some of the same excuses Holly did, on the rare occasions when Connecticut loses, because sometimes the disease of not listening to the coach and getting away from team basketball reaches all the way to the far end of the bench, but the important point is these are rare occasions. It doesn’t happen 13 times a year, or 6 games in a row.
The guy who sits in front of me at games turned around several times to say, do we even have a play called? Because, sometimes, it didn’t look like we did. I think this year’s team was better at playing together than some of the teams in the recent past; less likely to have everyone trying to take over the game and win unaided, which doesn’t work very often. Melding a team out of so many individual McDonald’s All Stars must be challenging, but if it isn’t done, they’re going nowhere. This year’s team seemed to suffer from the opposite problem; instead of having too many players trying to take over the game, there weren’t enough stepping up. They were notorious slow getting started, even in games they won. It takes a lot of energy to come continually from behind after spotting the opponent double-digit leads; you’re going to lose games you shouldn’t have lost that way, as well as almost certainly losing against teams at your own or higher talent level. This could just be the youth of the team, or the lack of character on the team, but it’s hard to absolve any coach completely of blame, when you see this same pattern over and over.
So, Holly’s gone. It looks as though the Athletic Department is properly respectful of and grateful for her many contributions to the team, as a player, as a long-time assistant and then co-head coach, and finally as a head coach all alone, and I don’t think even many of her detractors doubt her sincerity and effort on behalf of the program, even if they were dissatisfied with the end result. I had hoped she would either decide to retire on her own, or, choose that option as opposed to being fired, if the university offered it; I suspect Fulmer did offer it, and I assume Holly preferred to be on the record as not having been a quitter. That’s a big part of the Pat Summitt legacy; you fight to the end, and even beyond. Here’s hoping the next chapter of her life, whatever it is, brings her joy.
This blog, as you can see if you scroll back a little bit, is pretty inactive. I don’t have any plans to revive it except for the odd article now and then, such as this one, when the spirit moves me. But as long as I’m here, I might as well throw in some impressions of this year’s players. Again, not coming from a basketball expert in any sense of the word, just a regular fan throwing in two unnecessary cents.
Evina Westbrook-The straw that stirs the drink. How Westbrook goes is the best determinant of how the team goes. More consistent as a sophomore than a freshman but flashes of brilliance offset by foul trouble sometimes, ineffective stretches at others. The comments to the press are problematic. Not a superstar yet.
Rennia Davis-Best freshman last year, hands down. Seemed not to be as effective as a sophomore, may have regressed rather than improved. I think she missed Mercedes and Jaime on the front line and took a long time to adjust. She shot from outside too much, especially early, and didn’t start playing close to the basket with as much confidence and effectiveness until later in the season. Way athletic, still a ton of potential.
Mimi Collins-Improved steadily with more playing time, which was earned. Scrapper, not afraid to dive for loose balls or jump for rebounds. Definite asset.
Kamera Harris-Little used, perhaps injury problems. Expected more based on previous season when she often put in quality minutes. This year, not so much. Could be a contributor next year, or maybe not.
Meme Jackson-Deadly defender, streaky offensive player with a knack for hitting occasional big shots, then fading back into obscurity. Didn’t have the star mentality she should have had. Too much foul trouble.
Kasiyahna Kushkituah-Conditioning still a problem. Was most disappointing freshman, spent most of sophomore year riding the bench as well, even though needed with Russell and Nared graduated. Not effective when in the lineup most of the time, but had some good games at the end of the season, rekindling hopes that she can be the center the team needs.
Rae Burrell-Like Collins, a scrapper. She needed more playing time, should have had it. Had a lot of offensive moves, active on defense, played with confidence and energy, although perhaps forced shots too often that didn’t drop.
Jazmine Massengill-Another talented player. Confident and competent. Like the entire freshman class, played like a veteran, solid.
Zaay Green-the best of the freshmen, athletic, good shooter, great court presence. Should have an expanded role with Jackson graduating.
Cheridene Green-Quietly effective. Never seemed to be doing much, consistently turning in double doubles. On a team of all-Americans, the players going about their business with heads down and consistent productivity might be the most valuable.
Lou Brown-Missed most of the season with an injury. If on the bench enthusiasm and energy is a measure of anything, should be an impact player if she is eligible to come back for another season and chooses to do so.
This wraps up the Holly Warlick era and, possibly, depending on who the next coach is, the Pat Summitt era as well. Pat has a long coaching tree, and I’m sure Fulmer will be tempted to continue her heritage by tapping someone in it to continue the legacy, but it’s by no means certain he’ll go that way, and I’m not sure that he should. I’m hoping for a younger coach, a person who is inspired and inspiring, dedicated not only to winning but also to winning right, and who, if push comes to shove, will choose doing right over winning. I think the program has been fortunate to have two coaches in a row who had passion and integrity. That’s the tradition that needs continuing. Give us championships, but give us sportsmanship too.